MAPPING W3C 5 STARS AND MELODA
Find here a mapping table in order to understand how it is related a 5 stars qualifying of a data source and a MELODA assessment of a data source.
|
5 stars
|
MELODA
|
|||
|
MELODA
|
Legal
|
Technical
|
Accessibility
|
|
|
★ make your stuff available on the web (whatever format) but with an open licence
|
> 17%
|
Minimum 25 %
It could be protected with an open licence but only private use
|
Minimum 0 %
It could be privative standards
|
Minimum 25 %
The access to information could require a manual selection of dataset althoguh being in an URL
|
|
★★ Available as machine-readable structured data (e.g. excel instead of image scan of a table)
|
> 17% |
Minimum 25 %
It could be protected with an open licence but only private use
|
Minimum 0 %
It could be privative standards
|
Minimum 25 %
The access to information could require a manual selection of dataset althoguh being in an URL
|
|
★★★ as (2) plus non-proprietary format (e.g. CSV instead of excel)
|
>25% |
Minimum 25 %
It could be protected with an open licence but only private use
|
Minimum 25 %
It could be an non-propietary format but without explanation about the content
|
Minimum 25 %
The access to information could require a manual selection of dataset althoguh being in an URL
|
|
★★★★ All the above plus, Use open standards from W3C (RDF and SPARQL) to identify things, so that people can point at your stuff
|
>67% |
Minimum 25 %
It could be protected with an open licence but only private use
|
100 %
Using RDF and SPARQL
|
Minimum 75 %
It could no tinclude specific information about how to use data
|
|
★★★★★ All the above, plus: Link your data to other people’s data to provide context
|
>75% |
Minimum 50 %
It could be protected with an open licence but only for non commercial uses
|
100 %
Using RDF and SPARQL
|
Minimum 75 %
It could no tinclude specific information about how to use data
|
Comments are currently closed.